|
What's the deal with desirable difficulty principle in learning?
|
I keep hearing about this "desirable difficulty principle" in learning contexts. The basic idea seems to be that making learning slightly harder actually helps you remember things better in the long run.
But I'm trying to figure out where the line is between "desirable difficulty" and just plain frustrating. Like, if something's too easy, you don't really learn it well, but if it's too hard, you just give up.
Anyone have experience applying this principle? Maybe with learning new programming concepts or studying for technical certifications? How do you create that sweet spot where the challenge is just right to maximize learning without causing burnout?
The desirable difficulty principle is fascinating because it challenges our intuition about learning. We naturally want things to be easy, but research shows that when learning requires some effort, it actually leads to better long-term retention.
I think the key is finding that sweet spot where the challenge is meaningful but not overwhelming. For example, when learning a new programming language, instead of just following tutorials step by step, try modifying the code or solving a slightly different problem than what's presented. That extra cognitive effort makes the learning stick better.
The desirable difficulty principle works well with the spacing effect too. When you space out your learning, the retrieval becomes more difficult (you have to work harder to remember), and that difficulty is actually desirable for long-term retention.
As a beginner coder, I struggle with this all the time. Like, when I'm working on a coding problem, sometimes I'll get stuck for hours. At what point do I look up the solution vs. keep struggling?
I think the desirable difficulty principle says that some struggle is good - it means you're actually learning. But there's definitely a line where it becomes counterproductive. For me, if I've been stuck on the same concept for more than an hour without any progress, I'll usually look for hints rather than the full solution.
The hard part is that what's desirably difficult" changes as you get better. Something that was super challenging a month ago might be easy now. So you have to keep adjusting the difficulty level.
I teach Python to beginners, and I'm constantly balancing the desirable difficulty principle. If I make everything too easy, students don't really learn - they just follow instructions. If I make it too hard, they get frustrated and give up.
What I've found works is scaffolding. Start with something moderately challenging but with lots of support. Then gradually remove the support as they get better. For example, I might give them code with some blanks to fill in, then later give them a problem description and have them write the whole thing from scratch.
The desirable difficulty principle is about that optimal level of challenge where they have to think and problem-solve, but they're not completely lost. It's definitely more art than science.
In career coaching, I see the desirable difficulty principle play out with skill development. People often want to take the easiest path to learn something, but that doesn't lead to mastery.
For example, when learning a new software tool, watching tutorial videos is easy but passive. Actually using the tool to complete a real project is harder but leads to much better learning. That's desirable difficulty - the struggle of figuring things out, making mistakes, and problem-solving creates deeper understanding.
The challenge is that desirable difficulty feels uncomfortable in the moment. It's easier to do what's familiar and easy. But for long-term growth, you need to embrace that discomfort. That's why I encourage clients to take on projects that stretch their abilities just beyond their comfort zone.
The desirable difficulty principle reminds me of weight training. You don't get stronger by lifting weights that are too light, and you don't get stronger by trying to lift weights that are way too heavy and injuring yourself. You get stronger by lifting weights that are challenging but doable.
In learning networking concepts, I create labs that are just beyond what students can easily do. They have to think, experiment, and sometimes fail before they figure it out. That struggle is where the real learning happens.
The trick is knowing your students' current level and creating challenges that are in that zone of proximal development" - not too easy, not too hard. That's the sweet spot of desirable difficulty.
For certification exams, the desirable difficulty principle explains why practice tests that are slightly harder than the actual exam are so effective. When you practice with questions that make you think harder, the actual exam feels easier by comparison.
I always recommend that my certification students use practice tests that are known to be challenging. The struggle of working through difficult questions creates deeper understanding. If you only practice with easy questions, you're not really preparing for the cognitive effort required on the actual exam.
The desirable difficulty principle also applies to how you study. Passive reading is easy but ineffective. Active recall (trying to remember information without looking at your notes) is harder but much more effective for long-term retention.
|
