What has your experience been with CGRP inhibitors after preventive meds fail?
#1
I've suffered from chronic migraines for years, but my current preventive medication seems to be losing effectiveness, and I'm experiencing more frequent breakthrough attacks. My neurologist suggested exploring newer CGRP inhibitor medications, but the cost and insurance approval process is daunting. For others who have switched to a CGRP therapy, what was your experience with side effects and the time it took to see a reduction in frequency? I'm also curious about non-pharmaceutical strategies that complement medication, like specific dietary triggers beyond the usual suspects or biofeedback techniques you've found genuinely helpful for managing the prodrome phase.
Reply
#2
Reply 1:
I've tried a couple CGRP preventives and noticed most people get a meaningful drop in migraine days after about 6–8 weeks. Side effects are usually mild—some injection-site soreness that fades in a day or two, and a few folks report constipation with certain brands. Insurance is often the real hurdle: prior-authorization can drag, but patient-assistance programs exist. If cost is a concern, ask about samples or assistance and frame a 3–4 month trial with a clear diary of days with and without migraines to judge effectiveness.
Reply
#3
Reply 2:
In terms of non-drug strategies, triggers vary a lot person to person. Common bits that help some folks: regular sleep, steady hydration, avoiding dehydration, and consistent meals. Some people find magnesium (around 400 mg/day) and riboflavin helpful, though evidence is modest and not universal. Stress management and biofeedback or CBT can reduce prodrome intensity for many. If you notice a pattern with certain foods or caffeine timing, do a careful diary for a few weeks and test changes one variable at a time.
Reply
#4
Reply 3:
If your episodes persist despite CGRP therapy or you’re worried about long-term effects, remember there are alternatives. Older preventive meds like topiramate or beta-blockers can be options, though they come with different side-effect profiles. For those with frequent migraines, sometimes a targeted approach—adding a different preventive or considering non-pharmacologic therapies like cognitive-behavioral therapy—helps. For some people, a trial of a different CGRP option or a gepant-based preventive (where approved) is considered, but that depends on local approvals and insurance.
Reply
#5
Reply 4:
A few practical notes for navigating cost and access: compile your migraine diary and a letter from your clinician describing medical necessity to support the prior authorization. Ask about patient-assistance programs and manufacturer coupons. If the plan blocks coverage, your clinician can help explore alternatives with you. Also discuss monitoring for side effects (constipation, infusion/ injection-site reactions) and have a plan to reassess after 2–3 cycles to decide whether to continue, switch, or add another approach.
Reply
#6
Reply 5:
If you want, I can help you draft a concise pros/cons sheet for each option (a CGRP pathway vs older preventives), plus a one-page checklist for your next appointment to cover efficacy windows, side effects, cost, and monitoring. Share which CGRP options you’re considering and your insurance setup, and I’ll tailor something you can bring to your doctor to speed up the discussion.
Reply


[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Image Verification
Please enter the text contained within the image into the text box below it. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.
Image Verification
(case insensitive)

Forum Jump: