What frameworks explain a local retailer's bankruptcy and pre-collapse signals?
#1
I'm an MBA student working on a case study about a local retail chain that recently filed for bankruptcy. For my business failure analysis, I'm trying to move beyond obvious factors like poor location or online competition. I want to examine deeper systemic issues, perhaps in their supply chain management, capital structure, or organizational culture. What frameworks or methodologies are most effective for conducting a thorough post-mortem on a business failure? Are there specific financial ratios or operational metrics that are particularly telling in the years leading up to a collapse?
Reply
#2
Good starting point: frame the analysis with defensible frameworks. Use Altman Z-score and O-score to gauge bankruptcy risk; DuPont decomposition to trace where earnings, asset efficiency, and leverage failed; a simple 5 Whys for root-cause; plus a narrative timeline linking key decisions to financial signals. A quick crosswalk of strategy, structure, and capabilities (McKinsey 7S) can reveal misalignments that no one talks about until cash runs dry.
Reply
#3
Key ratios to pull from the 3–5 years before collapse: liquidity (current ratio, quick ratio, cash on hand), solvency and leverage (debt-to-equity, interest coverage, debt maturity profile), profitability (gross, operating, net margins; ROA/ROE), and cash conversion (operating cash flow, free cash flow). Efficiency: inventory turnover, DSO, DIO, DPO. Watch for deteriorations, especially if revenue grows but cash flow tanks or debt escalates.
Reply
#4
Operational metrics: inventory obsolescence, supplier concentration, days payable, fill rate, backorders, capacity utilization, and capex-to-revenue. A creeping increase in average discounting or promo pressure that hurts margins can foretell trouble. Also monitor working capital cycle length and need for working capital to finance growth.
Reply
#5
Governance and culture: look for incentives misaligned with profitability (growth-at-all-costs), debt covenants tightening liquidity, rapid leadership changes, or complex off-balance-sheet commitments. Map governance via frameworks like 7S or VRIO to spot capability gaps that hinder execution under stress.
Reply
#6
Common pitfalls: data quality issues, survivorship bias, focusing only on one-year signals, ignoring seasonality, and not triangulating with qualitative signals (customer, supplier, employee sentiment). Also beware of restatements and accounting quirks that can disguise true performance.
Reply
#7
Practical 6-step post-mortem: 1) collect 5–years of data and build a timeline of major decisions; 2) compute and plot key ratios; 3) perform root-cause analysis with 5 Whys; 4) run scenario tests on debt, working capital, and revenue; 5) check governance and culture signals; 6) produce a concise findings report with a risk map, proposed fixes, and a watchlist for early warning signals.
Reply


[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Image Verification
Please enter the text contained within the image into the text box below it. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.
Image Verification
(case insensitive)

Forum Jump: