What EQ mixing techniques actually make a difference in your final mix?
#1
I see so many tutorials about EQ mixing techniques, but honestly most of them just show you how to use an EQ plugin without explaining when and why to use specific techniques.

What EQ mixing techniques have you found that actually make a noticeable difference in your mixes? I'm talking about things like subtractive EQ before additive, high-pass filtering everything that doesn't need low end, or specific frequency ranges to focus on for different instruments.

Also, are there any EQ mixing techniques that you've found work better in certain genres? Or techniques that are basically universal regardless of what you're mixing?
Reply
#2
The EQ mixing technique that made the biggest difference for me is subtractive EQ before additive. Instead of boosting frequencies I want to hear more of, I first cut frequencies that are causing problems or masking other elements. This creates space in the mix naturally, without adding buildup.

Another crucial technique is high pass filtering. I put a high pass filter on almost every track (except kick and bass), set just below where the fundamental frequency of that instrument lives. This removes rumble and low end buildup that you don't even notice until it's gone.

Also, learning to use narrow Q cuts for problem frequencies vs wide Q boosts for tonal shaping. Narrow cuts can surgically remove annoying resonances, while wide boosts can gently shape the tone without sounding artificial.
Reply
#3
One EQ mixing technique that transformed my mixes is what I call frequency slotting." Instead of EQing instruments in isolation, I think about which frequency ranges each instrument should occupy. For example, giving the kick drum the sub frequencies, the bass guitar the low mids, rhythm guitars the upper mids, etc.

This technique involves making complementary EQ moves. If I boost the snare at 200Hz for body, I might cut other instruments in that range to make space. Or if the vocals need presence at 3kHz, I might gently dip guitars or cymbals in that range.

Also, the technique of using multiple gentle EQ moves instead of one drastic move. Four 1dB cuts in different places often sounds more natural than one 4dB cut in one place.
Reply
#4
As someone obsessed with EQ, I've found that the most effective EQ mixing techniques are the ones that work with the natural frequency content of the source. For example, instead of trying to make a dull snare bright by boosting highs, I might first cut the low mids that are making it sound boxy. Often, removing what's wrong reveals what's right.

Another technique that's universally useful is the sweep and destroy" method for finding problem frequencies. Boosting a narrow Q band and sweeping through the frequency spectrum until you find the annoying resonance, then cutting it. This works for vocal sibilance, guitar string squeak, drum ring, etc.

Also, understanding that different EQ types (parametric, graphic, shelf, filter) have different uses. Using a high shelf for overall brightness vs. a bell curve for specific frequency adjustment makes a big difference.
Reply
#5
The EQ mixing technique that helped me most is what I call EQ in context." I used to EQ tracks in solo, get them sounding great alone, then discover they didn't work in the mix. Now I do all my EQ with the full mix playing (or at least with the most important related tracks).

This technique forces you to make EQ decisions based on how elements work together rather than in isolation. You might discover that what sounded like a problem frequency in solo is actually fine in context, or that a frequency you thought was missing isn't needed because another instrument covers it.

Also, the technique of using EQ to create depth. Cutting highs can push elements back in the mix, while boosting presence frequencies can bring them forward. This is much more effective than just using volume or reverb for depth.
Reply
#6
As a beginner, the EQ mixing techniques that actually help are the simple, repeatable ones. Like the high pass everything" rule (with exceptions for kick and bass). Just doing that made my mixes clearer immediately.

Another simple technique that works is the "vocal notch" - cutting a narrow band around 3-4kHz on instruments that compete with vocals. It doesn't have to be drastic, just 1-2dB can make the vocals sit better without obviously affecting the other instruments.

Also, learning which frequency ranges are important for different instruments. Like knowing that snare crack lives around 2-5kHz, bass definition is in the 800Hz-1.5kHz range, vocal presence is 2-4kHz. Having these mental reference points helps you know where to start when EQing.
Reply


[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Image Verification
Please enter the text contained within the image into the text box below it. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.
Image Verification
(case insensitive)

Forum Jump: