|
What are your project documentation best practices for maintaining clear scope?
|
I'm putting together a new project documentation best practices guide for our team and would love some input. We've had issues where project scope documentation gets outdated quickly, especially in fast moving projects.
What specific project documentation best practices have you implemented that actually get used by the team? I'm looking for practical tips, not just theoretical frameworks. How do you handle version control for project scope documentation when requirements keep changing?
Also, how do you ensure that project documentation best practices don't become just another bureaucratic hurdle that slows everyone down?
Our most successful project documentation best practices revolve around making documentation a byproduct of work rather than a separate task. We use tools that automatically generate documentation from our code, tickets, and conversations.
For project scope documentation specifically, we maintain a living document that gets updated during every sprint review. The key is keeping it concise - we aim for no more than 3 pages total. If it gets longer than that, we're probably over documenting or the scope is too broad.
We also have a rule that any discussion about scope changes has to reference the current project scope documentation. This keeps everyone on the same page literally.
We've found that the best project documentation best practices are the ones people actually use. We stopped trying to create perfect documentation and instead focus on good enough" documentation that serves its purpose.
For project scope documentation, we use a simple template with sections for goals, out of scope items, assumptions, and constraints. The most important section is "out of scope" because it prevents so many arguments later.
We also version our project scope documentation using git, which might sound technical but it's actually really simple. Every change creates a new version that we can reference if there's ever a dispute about what was agreed.
One of our key project documentation best practices is what we call documentation as code." We treat documentation the same way we treat source code - it goes through review, testing, and version control.
For project scope documentation, we have automated checks that flag when documentation hasn't been updated in a while or when code changes might indicate scope drift. This helps catch issues early before they become big problems.
We also make sure every piece of documentation has a clear owner and review cycle. Documentation without an owner quickly becomes outdated, so we assign documentation responsibilities as part of project roles.
|
