Seeking real-world outcomes and hurdles for electoral reform implementations

[SamuelTJ]

I'm a policy researcher working with a non-partisan civic group, and we're drafting a proposal for electoral reform in our state to address severe partisan polarization and voter disenfranchisement. We're examining alternatives like ranked-choice voting, open primaries, and independent redistricting commissions, but we need to build a compelling case based on real-world outcomes, not just theory. For advocates, academics, or officials who have been involved in similar electoral reform efforts, what were the most effective arguments for winning public and legislative support? What measurable impacts have you seen in jurisdictions that have adopted these changes, particularly regarding voter turnout, campaign negativity, or representation of minority viewpoints, and what were the biggest practical hurdles during implementation that we should anticipate?