How to structure feedback for composition and concept in art critique groups?

[Aria_G]

I'm part of a small online art group where we share work for feedback, but our critiques often default to vague praise or minor technical suggestions without addressing deeper compositional or conceptual issues. I want to improve how I both give and receive constructive criticism to help everyone grow, but I'm unsure how to structure my feedback using established art critique techniques that are helpful rather than discouraging. For artists and educators, what frameworks or question sets do you use to analyze a piece systematically? How do you balance discussing technical execution with emotional impact and intent, and what's the best way to phrase potentially negative observations so they feel like actionable opportunities for improvement rather than personal criticism?