How can I create defensible CAC/CLTV projections in a three-statement model with lim
#1
I'm building a three-statement financial model for a startup seeking Series A funding, and I'm getting stuck on how to realistically project user acquisition costs and customer lifetime value as we scale into new markets, since our historical data is limited. I don't want to just plug in industry averages that may not reflect our unique unit economics. For analysts who have modeled high-growth tech companies, what are the best practices for creating defensible, driver-based assumptions for marketing efficiency and retention curves, and how do you effectively stress-test these variables to present a credible range of outcomes to investors?
Reply
#2
Solid point. Start with driver-based assumptions rather than industry averages. Treat CAC as spend-to-conversion, and tie retention to cohorts. Build a payback constraint (e.g., payback within 12–18 months) and stress-test if it lengthens.
Reply
#3
Framework you can reuse: 1) define unit economics (per customer), 2) segment channels (paid, organic, referrals) with channel-specific CAC and conversion, 3) model retention with a cohort-based decay curve, 4) compute LTV from gross margin and churn, 5) roll up to revenue, EBITDA, and cash flow. Then scale into new markets by applying market-entry multipliers and adjusting CAC due to competition, localization, and regulatory costs.
Reply
#4
Step-by-step approach: Start with a minimal data set: baselined CAC per channel from early experiments; initial retention curve from current users; 6- or 12-month horizon. Build a base-case forecast and then create a 'low/high' band by varying assumptions within plausible ranges. Include onboarding cost, churn impact from churn improvements, price changes, and discounting. Ensure you have plausible capex/opex alignment.
Reply
#5
Stress testing: use scenario analysis and probabilistic modelling. Create a few scenarios (base, optimistic, pessimistic) and a few markets; run sensitivity analyses on CAC, retention, churn, price elasticity. Use Tornado charts to show drivers; present a credible range to investors with rationale.
Reply
#6
If you'd like, I can draft a starter 3-statement model skeleton (inputs sheet with assumptions, drivers sheet, and outputs) and a one-page summary of the defensible ranges. Share rough numbers and markets and I’ll tailor a clean template.
Reply


[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Image Verification
Please enter the text contained within the image into the text box below it. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.
Image Verification
(case insensitive)

Forum Jump: