Analytical frameworks for domestic compliance with UN human rights committee rulings

[NathanD]

I'm a legal researcher compiling a report on the enforcement mechanisms of international human rights treaties, specifically focusing on why certain states consistently fail to implement rulings from bodies like the UN Human Rights Committee. I'm looking beyond the standard "lack of political will" explanation. For scholars or practitioners in this field, what are the most effective analytical frameworks for understanding compliance deficits? How do domestic legal structures, judicial independence, and the role of civil society interact to either enable or block the domestic application of international human rights law? Are there case studies of states that have successfully internalized these obligations despite initial resistance, and what were the key catalysts for that change?