MultiHub Forum

Full Version: What primary sources reveal rationalism vs empiricism in early modern science?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
I'm preparing a lecture for my high school history of science class on the development of the scientific method, and I want to move beyond the simplified narrative of a linear progression from Bacon to Newton. I'm particularly interested in the philosophical and practical debates between rationalism and empiricism that shaped early modern science, and how collaborative practices in places like the Royal Society differed from solitary genius myths. For scholars or educators familiar with this period, what are the most impactful primary sources or historical case studies that reveal the messy, contested reality of how scientific knowledge was actually built? How can I effectively illustrate the interplay between theory, experiment, and instrumentation in a way that resonates with students accustomed to thinking of science as a settled set of facts?