MultiHub Forum

Full Version: Are mixing and mastering tutorials better when separate or combined?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
I've been watching a lot of mixing and mastering tutorials lately, and I'm noticing two different approaches. Some tutorials treat mixing and mastering as completely separate processes with different goals, while others combine them into one workflow.

Personally, I think it's important to understand both, but I'm curious what others think. Are mixing and mastering tutorials that combine both processes actually helpful, or do they confuse beginners? Should you learn them separately first, then learn how they connect?

Also, what are some good mixing and mastering tutorials that actually explain the relationship between the two? I've seen too many that just show you how to make things loud without explaining why certain mixing decisions affect mastering.
I think mixing and mastering tutorials should be separate at first, then combined once you understand the basics. When you're learning, it's too confusing to think about both processes at once. You need to understand what mixing is trying to accomplish (balance, clarity, emotion) and what mastering is trying to accomplish (consistency, loudness, translation) before you can understand how they relate.

That said, there are some great mixing and mastering tutorials that show the complete workflow from raw tracks to finished master. The PureMix" channel does these sometimes, where they take a song from tracking through mixing to mastering. Those are valuable because you see how decisions in each stage affect the next.

The key is finding tutorials that explain why certain mixing choices make mastering easier or harder.
I've found that mixing and mastering tutorials that combine both processes often oversimplify mastering. They'll show you how to put a limiter on the master bus and call it mastering, which isn't really accurate. Mastering is about objective listening, quality control, and preparing the mix for distribution.

That said, there's value in tutorials that show how to mix with mastering in mind. Like how leaving appropriate headroom, avoiding excessive limiting on individual tracks, and managing low end can make the mastering engineer's job easier (or your own mastering process if you're doing both).

The best mixing and mastering tutorials I've seen are the ones where a professional mastering engineer critiques mixes and explains what they would need to do to fix issues. That teaches you what to listen for in your own mixes.
What bothers me about many mixing and mastering tutorials is they treat mastering as just make it louder." That's such a disservice to what mastering actually is. Mastering is about balance, translation across systems, and quality control.

I think beginners should learn mixing first, then learn mastering separately. Once you understand both, you can learn how they interact. There are some good tutorials that show this interaction well - like how certain EQ decisions in mixing affect what the mastering engineer can do, or how compression in mixing affects the final loudness potential.

The "Mastering.com" YouTube channel has some excellent content about this. They often bring in mixing engineers to discuss how they approach mixes with mastering in mind, which is really educational.
As a beginner, I find combined mixing and mastering tutorials really confusing. When I watch them, I can't tell which parts are mixing and which are mastering. Everything just blends together and I don't understand what each step is trying to accomplish.

I've found it much more helpful to watch separate tutorials. First, watch mixing tutorials that show you how to take raw tracks and turn them into a balanced mix. Then watch mastering tutorials that show you how to take that mix and prepare it for release.

Once I understood them separately, I could start to see how they connect. Like how the mixing decisions affect what's possible in mastering, or why certain mixing approaches make mastering easier.
As a mastering engineer, I have strong opinions about this. Mixing and mastering are fundamentally different processes with different goals and mindsets. Combining them in tutorials often leads to bad habits, like mixing into a limiter or making mastering decisions while you're still mixing.

That said, there is value in understanding how the two processes interact. The best mixing and mastering tutorials I've seen are ones where a mixing engineer and mastering engineer collaborate. They show how communication between the two can lead to better results, and how understanding the mastering process can make you a better mixer.

For example, tutorials that show how certain mixing decisions (like excessive stereo widening or improper low end management) create problems in mastering are very educational. They teach you to mix with the end goal in mind.