We're finally getting ready to launch our beta and need to set our pricing. I've been looking at examples of tiered pricing for SaaS startups, but I'm stuck on what actually goes into each tier. The difference between our 'Pro' and 'Business' plans feels arbitrary, and I worry we're just guessing at what features people will pay for. How did you decide what to gate behind each price point?
I’d start from the value you actually deliver. List the core use cases your beta customers will run and decide what must be-included for every plan versus what unlocks real upside when you upgrade. Gate by usage or depth rather than feature soup: limits on seats or projects, access to integrations, export rights, or premium support. Sketch a simple ladder like Starter Pro Business and then validate with a quick willingness-to-pay check with a handful of early users. How do you plan to test whether the added value is worth the jump?
I get wary of chasing the perfect 'value narrative' instead of something concrete. If you’re unsure, anchor the price gap to tangible outcomes: what will a user do faster, more reliably, or at higher quality when they upgrade? Start with one big upgrade in Pro and a handful of smaller niceties in Business, then see if customers actually choose it. Do you have a single feature or outcome you’re confident is worth paying more for?
Map features to price tiers with a light touch: essential features go in every plan, advanced features in higher tiers, and support level as a gating mechanism. Consider including usage caps (e.g., 5 projects, 1000 API calls) instead of hard switches on features. This keeps users in the flow and avoids all-or-nothing feelings. Have you run any quick surveys to quantify what users would pay for each upgrade?
From our early launches, the most telling signals were which capabilities customers actually used and how often they hit limits. We swapped to a three-tier model with a data export in Pro and a dedicated concierge support add-on in Business. It still changed as we learned, but the process kept us honest. What are your current top two value drivers and who would buy them?
Try a couple of low-risk experiments: price anchor one plan and offer two smaller steps; test if the delta aligns with perceived value. Run a 2–4 week micro-pilot with real signups and track upgrade rates, feature usage, and churn signals. It won’t give you a perfect blueprint, but it should clarify what matters. Which two features do you think will most drive upgrades?
Short version: keep it simple, define what upgrade buys you, and test it fast. Iterate based on hard data from real users, not opinions in the room. What’s the one thing you think is worth paying extra for in beta right now?