MultiHub Forum

Full Version: Choosing kubeadm, Rancher, or OpenShift for on-prem Kubernetes bare-metal and VMs
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
I'm setting up a new Kubernetes cluster on-premises for our development team to host a suite of microservices, and I'm trying to decide between using kubeadm, Rancher, or OpenShift for the initial deployment. Our infrastructure is a mix of bare-metal and virtual machines, and we need something that's relatively easy to maintain but also secure and scalable. What are the key considerations for a self-managed cluster versus using a managed distribution, and are there any specific pitfalls or best practices for networking and storage configuration in a hybrid environment like this?