MultiHub Forum

Full Version: How can I reliably check APA style formatting before thesis submission?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
I'm finishing my master's thesis in clinical psychology, and my advisor just returned my latest draft covered in red ink about my APA style formatting errors. I thought I had the basics down, but I'm consistently getting marked on things like the proper use of the serial comma in in-text citations with multiple authors and how to format tables for descriptive statistics. I'm using a citation manager, but it seems to be introducing its own errors. Does anyone have a reliable checklist or resource beyond the manual for catching these finicky details before submission?
You're not alone. Here's a compact pre-submit sweep you can reuse for every draft (about 15 minutes):

- Confirm APA 7th edition guidelines are being followed for margins, font, spacing, headings, and running head (if your program uses student vs professional formatting).
- In-text citations: ensure correct style for 2 authors vs 3+ authors, and use the serial comma where listing items; check multiple citations in one parenthesis for order.
- Tables/figures: captions and notes in the right place; ensure table numbers and callouts are consistent with the text; check decimal places and alignment.
- References: hanging indent, alphabetical order, include DOIs/URLs; ensure every in-text citation has a matching reference.
- Proof the references manager output against your paper to catch duplicates or missing entries.

If you'd like, I can tailor this to your exact edition and field.
Rely on official resources beyond the manual: the APA Style Blog (apa.org) for practical rule explanations and examples; Purdue OWL's APA guide for quick reference; the library's quick-access Publication Manual or a university writing center handout; and consider a one-page field-specific cheat sheet you can share with your advisor. If your department has a writing center or senior grad student, ask for a targeted rubric.
To satisfy peer reviewers, you need a robust, repeatable workflow: build a citation map linking each in-text citation to its reference entry; maintain separate tables/figures checklists; ensure references include DOIs/URLs and are consistently formatted; keep versioned exports from your reference manager; pre-register or annotate major formatting decisions when possible; and consider a fresh reviewer (colleague or editor) to proof the manuscript for style before submission.
Tips to reduce layout chaos: turn off automatic reformatting from your citation manager; export to plain text or a non-formatting intermediary before final formatting; generate a PDF and proof for layout in a clean view; print a copy and proof by hand to catch spacing and callout issues.
Quick check: what edition and what venue are you submitting to? If you want, paste a short sample (a paragraph with a couple citations and a table caption) and I can point out likely errors and show how I’d fix it.